In contemporary society, the term “liberalism” is frequently used, particularly in academic discussions, and it carries a range of meanings. The word originates from the Latin term liber, referring to a class of free men—those who were neither serfs nor slaves. It also connotes generosity, as in helping others with food, drink, or social attitudes, and is associated with openness and open-mindedness. At its core, liberalism is closely linked to the ideas of freedom and choice.
The central theme of liberal ideology is a strong commitment to individual freedom and the pursuit of a society where people can fulfill their interests and achieve personal fulfillment. Liberals prioritize the individual, viewing them as rational beings who should enjoy the maximum possible freedom. While individuals are entitled to equal legal and political rights, they should be rewarded based on their talents and efforts. Liberalism upholds the twin principles of constitutionalism and consent, aiming to protect citizens from the dangers of government tyranny.
To fully understand liberalism, it’s essential to explore its origins, development, core themes, the concept of the liberal state, constitutional government, democracy, and its various forms, such as classical liberalism, modern liberalism, neoliberalism, and the current state of liberalism in the twenty-first century. Liberalism emerged in the nineteenth century as a response to factors like feudalism, the doctrine of divine rights, absolutism, industrialization, and the rise of a new market economy. Its core principles include individualism, freedom, reason, justice, and toleration, and it champions the liberal state, constitutional government, and democracy.
Classical liberalism advocates for a “minimal state,” where the government’s role is limited to maintaining domestic order and personal security. In contrast, modern liberalism supports a “maximal state,” emphasizing state regulation and actions that consider the welfare of others. Neoliberalism focuses on market fundamentalism, stressing free trade and state deregulation. In the twenty-first century, liberalism has evolved to embrace ideas of globalism, the global village, and economic integration.
Table of Contents
Origin and Development
The origins and development of liberalism can be traced back to the nineteenth century, though its foundations were laid over the preceding three hundred years. Liberalism emerged as a dominant theory in response to several key factors that shaped Europe, including the decline of feudalism, challenges to the doctrine of divine rights, the rise of absolutism, and the onset of industrialization along with a new market economic order.
Feudalism: Liberalism took root as an ideology during the breakdown of feudalism in Europe, paving the way toward a capitalist society. It represented the aspirations of the rising middle class, whose interests were at odds with the established power of absolute monarchies and the landed aristocracy. Liberalism emphasized the need for fundamental reforms and revolutionary changes, as exemplified by the French Revolution and the American War of Independence in the late eighteenth century.
Divine Rights and Absolutism: Liberals directly challenged the absolute power of monarchies, which were often justified by the doctrine of the divine right of kings. They opposed absolutism and advocated for constitutional representative government. In doing so, liberals criticized the political and economic privileges enjoyed by the landed aristocracy, which were seen as unfair since they were based on birthright. Additionally, liberals questioned the authority of the established church, which held significant power in controlling the state.
Industrialization and the New Market Economic Order: The rapid industrialization in Europe fueled the spread of liberalism in the West. Liberalism supported industrialization and called for freedom from government interference. It emphasized individual freedom in the political sphere and advocated for a free trade economy in the economic sphere.
Core Themes of Liberalism
Liberalism is a political ideology or principles committed to a certain distinctive set of values and beliefs. The most important are as follows.
The Individual
In today’s modern world, the individual holds far greater political significance than was ever possible during the feudal era. In feudal societies, individuals had little opportunity to pursue their personal interests or express their unique identities. Instead, they were primarily seen as members of larger social groups—such as their family, village, local community, or social class—where their lives and identities were largely dictated by these affiliations. This left little room for personal change or growth across generations.
The breakdown of feudalism opened up new opportunities, offering people a broader range of choices and social possibilities. This shift allowed individuals to pursue their interests and enjoy greater personal freedom, enabling them to think independently and become “free men” who could take advantage of emerging opportunities.
As feudal societies disintegrated, a new intellectual climate emerged, replacing traditional theories with rational and scientific explanations. This change was reflected in the rise of natural rights theories in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) articulated the idea that individuals are “ends in themselves,” not merely means to other ends. Liberalism, in this context, aspires to create a society where each person has the opportunity to develop and flourish to their fullest potential.
Freedom
Individual freedom is considered the most crucial aspect of human existence, and liberals view the enjoyment of freedom or liberty as a fundamental right for every person. This belief allows individuals to pursue their interests by making choices freely. According to liberal thought, liberty is the only condition in which people can develop their skills, talents, and achieve their full potential. However, this does not imply absolute freedom or a “license” to harm others.
John Stuart Mill, in On Liberty (1859), argues that there should be minimal restrictions on individual freedom, but only to prevent harm to others. He differentiates between “self-regarding actions” and “other-regarding actions.” For self-regarding actions, individuals should have complete freedom. However, when it comes to actions that affect others, certain limitations may be imposed to protect people from harm.
While liberals agree on the importance of liberty, they have not always shared the same view on what it means to be free. In his essay Two Concepts of Liberty (1958), Isaiah Berlin distinguishes between the “negative” and “positive” theories of liberty. Classical liberals advocate for negative freedom, where individuals act without interference, based on their own choices. This type of freedom emphasizes the absence of external constraints (self-regarding actions). In contrast, modern liberals are more aligned with the positive conception of liberty, or positive freedom. Here, individuals do not enjoy absolute freedom; certain restrictions exist to safeguard others from harm (other-regarding actions).
Reason
Liberals argue that freedom is closely tied to reason and is a central aspect of the Enlightenment project. The Enlightenment aimed to free humanity from the constraints of superstition and ignorance, ushering in an “age of reason.” Thinkers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, Adam Smith, and Jeremy Bentham significantly shaped liberalism and rationalism. They believed that human beings are rational and capable of defining and pursuing their own interests. For this reason, the use of reason is paramount, emphasizing the importance of discussion, debate, and argument. Liberals generally hold an optimistic view of human nature, seeing people as creatures guided by reason.
Liberalism also recognizes that society is pluralistic, with diverse interests that can lead to conflict. Individuals compete for scarce resources, businesses vie for profits, and nations seek security and strategic advantage. Liberals believe that such conflicts can be resolved or mitigated through negotiation and debate. However, in certain situations, liberals condemn the use of force and aggression. They only see force as justified in cases of self-defense or to counter oppression, and only after all reasonable arguments and negotiations have been exhausted.
Justice
The dispensation of justice is a key pillar of liberalism. Justice involves a moral judgment concerning the fair distribution of rewards and punishments. Essentially, justice means giving each individual what they are “due.” More specifically, it refers to the equitable distribution of material benefits in society, such as wages, profits, housing, healthcare, and welfare benefits.
Liberalism’s theory of justice emphasizes a commitment to foundational equality, which is rooted in the belief in formal equality. Liberals argue that all individuals should enjoy equal status in society, particularly in the distribution of rights and entitlements. They maintain that everyone should be treated equally under the law, without discrimination based on gender, race, color, creed, religion, or social background. Rights should not be reserved for any particular class, making liberalism “difference-blind.” The most critical forms of formal equality in liberalism are legal equality and political equality.
Liberals also uphold the principle of equality of opportunity, ensuring that every individual has an equal chance to succeed or fail in society. However, the ability to rise in society depends on one’s capacity, capability, and skills. For liberals, equality means providing individuals with equal opportunities to develop their unique talents, leading to a meritocracy. Classical liberals have strongly endorsed meritocracy, both economically and morally. Economically, they stress the importance of incentives, while morally, they argue that justice demands unequal treatment for individuals with unequal abilities.
Modern liberals, however, place a greater emphasis on social justice and social equality. John Rawls, in A Theory of Justice (1970), argued that economic inequality is only justifiable if it benefits the poorest members of society.
Toleration
Liberalism embraces pluralism, recognizing that society is diverse, and so are individuals. Human beings are unique and distinct, and liberals champion diversity in society, which is closely linked to the idea of toleration. Toleration is both an ethical ideal and a social principle, reflecting the goal of personal autonomy and setting guidelines for how people should interact with one another. Many liberal thinkers have emphasized the importance of toleration.
John Milton and John Locke, for example, advocated for religious freedom. Locke argued that toleration is essential to democracy, as it helps government function effectively by safeguarding life, liberty, and property, without interference in other personal matters. He believed toleration should be applied to both public and private life. J.S. Mill, in On Liberty (1859), provided a broader defense of toleration, emphasizing its significance for both individuals and society. On a personal level, toleration ensures individual autonomy, fostering moral self-development. In the social realm, it contributes to the creation of a healthy and vibrant society.
For liberals, toleration is crucial to maintaining balance in a diverse society and resolving conflicts. A deeper sense of harmony is necessary to reconcile competing interests. For instance, there is often a conflict between workers and employers: workers seek higher wages, shorter hours, and better working conditions, while employers aim to maximize profits by minimizing costs. However, these competing interests are also complementary, as workers rely on employment, and employers need labor. Each group is essential to the other’s success, which helps maintain social equilibrium.
Liberal State and Democracy
The Liberal State
Liberals argue that a balanced and tolerant society does not arise automatically from the free actions of individuals and voluntary associations. They recognize that without proper regulation, free individuals may exploit others, steal their property, or even enslave them for personal gain. In such cases, the liberty of one person becomes a license to abuse others, putting everyone’s freedom at risk. To protect individuals from such threats, liberals believe that liberty must be safeguarded. This protection, they argue, can only be provided by a sovereign state capable of restraining individuals and groups within society.
Political philosophers like Thomas Hobbes and John Locke emphasized the need for a liberal sovereign state where liberty and freedom can be securely enjoyed. Locke famously asserted that freedom can only exist “under the law,” arguing that “where there is no law, there is no freedom.” Both Hobbes and Locke also contended that individuals must have political obligations to the state in order to maintain social equilibrium and foster a tolerant society.
Constitutional Government
While liberals recognize the necessity of government for governance, they also fear the potential for government tyranny against individuals. Since government is sovereign and run by individuals with political power, it can pose a continuous threat to individual liberty. Liberals understand that, as self-interested beings, those in power may naturally seek to influence others for their own benefit. In this context, Lord Acton’s famous warning, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” resonates deeply. To prevent arbitrary government, liberals advocate for limited government, believing it should be restrained through constitutional checks and balances.
A constitution serves as a framework of rules that distributes power and responsibilities among various government institutions while setting clear limits on the exercise of power. Constitutional limitations on government can be established in two key ways. First, legal constraints can be introduced by creating a written constitution that codifies the government’s major powers and duties in a single authoritative document, often referred to as “higher law.” Second, internal constraints can be introduced by dispersing political power across various institutions, ensuring a system of checks and balances.
French political philosopher Montesquieu (1689–1775) advanced the idea of the “separation of powers” among government institutions. He argued that the three branches of government—the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary—should operate independently and separately to prevent any individual or group from gaining dictatorial power. As Montesquieu famously stated, “power should be a check to power.”
Liberal Democracy
Liberal democracy is the most widely accepted form of government worldwide, characterized by a balance between individual freedom and limited government. This political system relies on principles designed to safeguard personal liberty and protect citizens from government overreach. Liberal democracy is grounded in several key principles, including regular and competitive elections that adhere to universal suffrage and political equality. It promotes constitutional government, governed by law and a clear set of rules, while ensuring civil liberties and individual rights.
A defining feature of liberal democracy is the decentralization of power through a system of checks and balances within government institutions. Regular elections based on the principle of “one person, one vote” and respect for universal suffrage are central to this system. Political pluralism, with healthy competition between political parties, is another hallmark. Liberal democracy encourages a robust civil society where organized groups and interest groups operate independently from the government. Economically, it supports a capitalist or private-enterprise system aligned with market principles.
When addressing conflicts, liberal democracy seeks “democratic solutions” based on majority rule, where the preferences of the majority (51 percent) prevail over those of the minority. This led French political thinker Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) to famously describe it as the “tyranny of the majority,” suggesting that individual and minority rights could be suppressed in the name of democracy. However, U.S. statesman and political theorist James Madison (1751–1836) countered this criticism, arguing that a system of checks and balances would protect against majoritarianism, ensuring that government remains responsive to competing minority interests and upholds individual rights and liberties.
Types of Liberalism
Classical Liberalism
Classical liberalism is the earliest form of liberalism, emerging during the transition from feudalism to capitalism and the early stages of industrialization in the 19th century. At its core, classical liberalism emphasizes an extreme form of individualism. It views individuals as inherently self-interested, self-reliant, and focused on personal gain. C.B. Macpherson coined the term “possessive individualism” to describe this mindset, where individuals prioritize their own interests over society or others.
Classical liberals champion “negative liberty,” meaning freedom from external constraints and non-interference by the state or government. In the words of Tom Paine, the state is a “necessary evil.” It is “necessary” to maintain law and order and protect individual security but is “evil” because it imposes collective will on society, limiting individual freedom. As a result, classical liberalism advocates for a “minimal” government or “night-watchman” state, whose sole role is to protect citizens from harm by others.
In the economic sphere, classical liberalism supports “economic liberalism,” which promotes a free-market economy. Advocating for laissez-faire capitalism, it argues that the economy functions best when left unregulated by the government, ensuring individual liberty, prosperity, and social justice.
Natural rights theorists like John Locke (1632–1704) in England and Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826) in America heavily influenced the development of liberal ideology in the 17th and 18th centuries. Locke and Jefferson argued that rights are “natural” (now often referred to as human rights) and are essential for living a truly human life. Locke emphasized that individuals possess three fundamental natural rights—life, liberty, and property—which the state must protect. Both Locke and Jefferson believed in limited government, with Locke asserting that government functions should be confined to maintaining public order, protecting property, and defending against external threats. Jefferson, committed to limited government and laissez-faire economics, opposed central government authority in the United States and championed individual freedom.
In contrast to natural rights theorists, utilitarianism also had a significant influence on classical liberalism. Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), a British philosopher and founder of utilitarianism, viewed humans as rational, self-interested beings who seek to maximize their utility. He provided a rationale for laissez-faire economics, constitutional reform, and political democracy, developing his utilitarian philosophy in Fragments of Government (1776) and Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789).
Classical liberalism further evolved in the late 18th and early 19th centuries with the economic theories of Adam Smith (1723–1790). Smith’s The Wealth of Nations (1776) made a profound contribution to discussions on the proper role of government and its limits in economic activity. Smith argued that the market is a self-regulating mechanism that requires no outside guidance and should be free from government interference. The laissez-faire doctrine calls for a free market where the state has no economic role, allowing the market to operate independently.
Modern Liberalism
In contrast to classical liberalism, modern liberalism advocates for greater state intervention and supports a “maximal” government rather than a “minimal” one. Modern liberalism, often referred to as welfare liberalism, acknowledges the role of the state in addressing societal inequalities. It gained prominence in the 20th century, as industrialization led to massive wealth creation but also exacerbated economic inequality. While industrial capitalism brought general prosperity and individual liberty, it also created significant social disparities. The classical liberal emphasis on economic individualism was increasingly criticized for failing to address these inequalities. In response, modern liberals called for state intervention to promote a more just society.
The evolution of modern liberalism was heavily influenced by the ideas of J.S. Mill (1806–73), T.H. Green (1836–82), and John Rawls (1921–2002). J.S. Mill played a key role in the transition from classical to modern liberalism. Initially, Mill defended laissez-faire individualism, but over time, he recognized its limitations in the face of new socio-economic challenges. He observed that the working class was not receiving its fair share in a capitalist economy and thus justified state intervention. Mill argued that neither individuals nor markets should have absolute freedom; rather, they should be regulated by the state to ensure fairness.
T.H. Green also rejected classical liberalism and laissez-faire individualism, which he believed perpetuated poverty and injustice. Green took a more optimistic view of human nature, contrasting with the classical liberal view of individuals as purely self-interested. He believed that individuals are capable of altruism and possess social, not just individual, responsibilities. Green’s ideas, influenced by socialist thought, emphasized that individuals are connected by ties of empathy and care, which laid the foundation for modern liberalism’s support for state intervention.
The 20th century saw a significant expansion of state intervention in both Western and developing countries, much of which took the form of social welfare programs. Governments aimed to address poverty, disease, and ignorance by providing welfare support to citizens. While the 19th century was characterized by minimal state intervention, the 20th century saw the rise of welfare states. John Rawls, in his influential work A Theory of Justice (1970), offered a philosophical defense of welfare and redistribution based on the principles of fairness and social justice.
Neo-Liberalism
Neoliberalism, also referred to as neo-classical liberalism or libertarianism, is a political and economic philosophy that champions free trade, deregulation, and a return to laissez-faire individualism. It opposes the welfare state and any form of government intervention in economic activities, arguing for minimal state interference in both individual and societal economic matters. Neoliberals believe that greater economic freedom leads to enhanced economic and social progress for individuals. Prominent advocates of neoliberalism include F.A. Hayek (1899–1992), Milton Friedman (1912–2006), and Robert Nozick (1938–2002).
In the latter half of the 20th century, these thinkers criticized the welfare state, arguing that it undermined individual liberty by forcibly redistributing resources from the competent to the less competent. To restore individual freedom, they sought to revive laissez-faire principles, asserting that a free market represents a true form of democracy when it operates without government regulation. They contended that welfare programs distort the democratic process by essentially trading votes for benefits, placing the burden on the most productive members of society.
Politically, neoliberalism promotes full autonomy and individual freedom, seeking to free individuals from the constraints of institutions such as religion, family, and societal customs that limit personal vision and freedom. It holds that human character, thought, and actions can be shaped by favorable circumstances, positioning individuals as architects of their own destinies. As a result, it opposes social and legal restrictions on personal freedom.
Neoliberalism is closely tied to the idea of market fundamentalism, advocating for an economy free from political control. Both Hayek and Friedman launched strong critiques of government intervention in the economy. Hayek, in particular, argued that central planning and economic intervention are inherently inefficient because state bureaucrats lack the capacity to process the vast array of information required to manage an economy effectively. Nozick, meanwhile, supported a minimal state with minimal taxation, rejecting the case for welfare and redistribution. He developed a rights-based theory of justice that emphasized principles of entitlement and supported a laissez-faire “nightwatchman” state.
Liberalism in 21st Century
Over the past two centuries, liberalism has significantly contributed to human prosperity, freedom, and development, marking an era of unprecedented advancement. The principles of human freedom, individual dignity, constitutional governance, civil society, constitutionalism, democracy, protection of minority rights, tolerance, and pluralism have flourished. This period has also seen remarkable technological and social innovations, leaving a lasting impact on society.
The liberal order took shape in 1945 with the conclusion of World War II and the establishment of key international institutions such as the United Nations, the Bretton Woods Institutions, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and the World Trade Organization. These organizations aimed to promote international peace and security and to create a foundation for global development. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 further bolstered this framework by guaranteeing human rights across economic, social, and cultural domains.
Following the dissolution of the USSR and the end of the Cold War in 1990, liberalism became the prevailing global order. The ideology gained prominence in U.S. policy, contributing to the rise of American hegemony after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Many nations adopted liberal principles, transitioning from authoritarian one-party systems to more competitive multi-party democracies, thereby expanding the range of social choices available to developing societies.
Liberalism also provided the institutional framework that facilitated globalization. The expansion of free trade, coupled with advancements in information and technology, transformed the world into a “global village.” Increased international trade, deregulation, and the formation of regional trading blocs boosted economic growth and prosperity, significantly reducing global poverty.
However, liberalism has faced substantial criticism in recent years. The rise of capitalism within the liberal framework has led to extreme economic inequality, both within and between nations. The disparity between the Global North and South and issues of dominance and dependency have highlighted global inequalities. Critics argue that the benefits of globalization, driven by liberalism, have been unevenly distributed. Consequently, there has been a rise in fundamentalism, extremism, authoritarianism, and nationalism in recent years.
Conclusion
The origins of liberalism can be traced back to the nineteenth century, influenced by several pivotal developments in Europe. These included the decline of feudalism, challenges to the doctrine of divine rights, opposition to absolutism, the surge of industrialization, and the emergence of a new market economy. These factors collectively established liberalism as a dominant political theory.
Liberalism is a political ideology grounded in values and beliefs that emphasize individualism, freedom, reason, justice, and tolerance. It advocates for a liberal state, constitutional governance, and democracy. Within its framework, liberalism is categorized into three main types: classical liberalism, modern liberalism, and neoliberalism.
Classical liberalism supports a “minimal state,” focused solely on maintaining domestic order and ensuring personal security. In contrast, modern liberalism advocates for a “maximal state” with greater regulation, particularly to address actions affecting others. Neoliberalism, on the other hand, emphasizes market fundamentalism, advocating for free trade and minimal state intervention.
In the twenty-first century, liberalism has evolved to promote globalism, the concept of a “global village,” and economic integration, reflecting its ongoing adaptation to contemporary global challenges.
References
- Heywood, Andrew (2007), Political Ideologies: An Introduction, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2007.
- Heywood, Andrew (2006), Politics, Palgrave Foundation, New York.
- Heywood, Andrew (2004), Political Theory, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
- John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, Anne Philips (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford University Press, New York.
- Gauba, O.P. (2003), An Introduction to Political Theory, Macmillan Publication, New Delhi.
- Bhargava Rajeev and Ashok Acharya (2008), Political Theory: An Introduction (Eds), Pearson Publication, New Delhi.
- Agarwal, R.C. (2004), Political Theory, S. Chand Publication, New Delhi.
- Ramaswamy, Sushila (2014), Political Theory, Ideas and Concepts, PHI Publication, New Delhi.
- Johari, J.C. (2012), Contemporary Political Theory, New Dimension, Basic Concepts and Major Trends, Sterling Publication, New Delhi.
- Assirvatham, Eddy and K.K. Mishra (2006), Political Theory, S. Chand Publication, New Delhi.
